- Topic
55k Popularity
31k Popularity
9k Popularity
12k Popularity
4k Popularity
4k Popularity
16k Popularity
22k Popularity
12k Popularity
2k Popularity
- Pin
- 🌟 Photo Sharing Tips: How to Stand Out and Win?
1.Highlight Gate Elements: Include Gate logo, app screens, merchandise or event collab products.
2.Keep it Clear: Use bright, focused photos with simple backgrounds. Show Gate moments in daily life, travel, sports, etc.
3.Add Creative Flair: Creative shots, vlogs, hand-drawn art, or DIY works will stand out! Try a special [You and Gate] pose.
4.Share Your Story: Sincere captions about your memories, growth, or wishes with Gate add an extra touch and impress the judges.
5.Share on Multiple Platforms: Posting on Twitter (X) boosts your exposure an
- 🎉 [Gate 30 Million Milestone] Share Your Gate Moment & Win Exclusive Gifts!
Gate has surpassed 30M users worldwide — not just a number, but a journey we've built together.
Remember the thrill of opening your first account, or the Gate merch that’s been part of your daily life?
📸 Join the #MyGateMoment# campaign!
Share your story on Gate Square, and embrace the next 30 million together!
✅ How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post a photo or video with Gate elements
2️⃣ Add #MyGateMoment# and share your story, wishes, or thoughts
3️⃣ Share your post on Twitter (X) — top 10 views will get extra rewards!
👉
California judge dismisses class action lawsuit against the Dfinity Foundation
ChainCatcher news, a federal judge in California dismissed the class action lawsuit against the Dfinity Foundation, the developer of ICP. U.S. District Court Judge James Donato granted Dfinity's motion to dismiss, ruling that the case was "time-barred" due to exceeding the three-year statute of limitations under the Securities Exchange Act. The court supported Dfinity's argument that its initial public offering of ICP tokens was in February 2017, thus the investor lawsuit from August 2021 has exceeded the statutory timeframe. At that time, the plaintiffs represented by Freedman Normand Friedland LLP (formerly Roche Freedman) did not respond to the defendants' arguments. Therefore, Judge Donato wrote that it was "inevitable" to dismiss these claims due to the statute of limitations.