- Topic1/3
14k Popularity
22k Popularity
16k Popularity
48k Popularity
20k Popularity
- Pin
- 📢 Gate Square #Creator Campaign Phase 2# is officially live!
Join the ZKWASM event series, share your insights, and win a share of 4,000 $ZKWASM!
As a pioneer in zk-based public chains, ZKWASM is now being prominently promoted on the Gate platform!
Three major campaigns are launching simultaneously: Launchpool subscription, CandyDrop airdrop, and Alpha exclusive trading — don’t miss out!
🎨 Campaign 1: Post on Gate Square and win content rewards
📅 Time: July 25, 22:00 – July 29, 22:00 (UTC+8)
📌 How to participate:
Post original content (at least 100 words) on Gate Square related to
- 📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
- 🎉 Gate Square’s "Spark Program" Surpasses 1,000 KOLs!
💥 The creator ecosystem is in full bloom!
📈 Get featured, earn rewards, and grow your influence—what are you waiting for?
💰 Cash incentives ✔️
🚀 Traffic support ✔️
👑 Exclusive verification ✔️
From 0 to 1,000 in just weeks—Gate Square is becoming the epicenter of Web3 content! ⚡
You’re not just posting content, but the next "viral opportunity"!
🌟 Join the Spark Program and kickstart your breakthrough!
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/45695
- 📢 #Gate Square Writing Contest Phase 3# is officially kicks off!
🎮 This round focuses on: Yooldo Games (ESPORTS)
✍️ Share your unique insights and join promotional interactions. To be eligible for any reward, you must also participate in Gate’s Phase 286 Launchpool, CandyDrop, or Alpha activities!
💡 Content creation + airdrop participation = double points. You could be the grand prize winner!
💰Total prize pool: 4,464 $ESPORTS
🏆 First Prize (1 winner): 964 tokens
🥈 Second Prize (5 winners): 400 tokens each
🥉 Third Prize (10 winners): 150 tokens each
🚀 How to participate:
1️⃣ Publish an
Bitcoin Genesis 16th Anniversary: A Review of the News Center's Past and the Decentralization Debate
Bitcoin News Center Archives: 16th Anniversary Review of the Genesis Block
In 2013, a "Bitcoin News Center" page briefly appeared on the Bitcoin.org website, aimed at providing journalists with contact information for experts related to Bitcoin. This seemingly simple page sparked an intense debate about who could represent Bitcoin, ultimately touching on deeper issues such as the essence and development direction of Bitcoin.
The issue originated from developer Mike Hearn's proposal to establish a news center page on Bitcoin.org. Subsequently, a list of media contacts was submitted to GitHub, but two candidates, Roger Ver and Jon Matonis, were excluded due to controversy. This sparked intense discussions within the community, with many believing that excluding these two active advocates was inappropriate.
Opponents like Luke-Jr are concerned that the political stance of Ver and Matonis is too extreme and may negatively impact Bitcoin. Supporters argue that Bitcoin is inherently a revolutionary movement and should not shy away from its rebellious spirit. A heated debate took place between both sides on the BitcoinTalk forum.
Andreas Antonopoulos expressed particular anger over this matter. After multiple attempts to expand the list's scope failed, he announced that he would create a new bitcoinpresscenter.org website.
Ultimately, the news center page of Bitcoin.org was taken down in January 2014. Although Andreas's website listed more contacts, it seems to have not gained significant influence. This debate reflects that in a decentralized system like Bitcoin, trying to establish a centralized representative list is destined to fail.
This small episode, although seemingly trivial, reflects the ongoing tension between decentralization and centralization in the development of Bitcoin. It is somewhat similar to the story of the Bitcoin Foundation - overly centralized models often provoke controversy, ultimately leading to their elimination or marginalization, while Bitcoin itself continues to develop. This may be a microcosm of Bitcoin's unique charm.