Decentralization stablecoin platform遭51% Attack. The attacker claims to be a penetration test.

Recently, a Decentralized Finance stablecoin network platform based on the Factom protocol suffered a 51% Attack. According to reports, four Miners joined forces to control 70% of the Computing Power of the network and tampered with the platform data.

These attackers initially had a wallet balance of only 11 dollars, but by manipulating the price of the yen-denominated stablecoin, they inflated the balance to 6.7 million dollars. Subsequently, they attempted to convert these funds into stablecoins pegged to the dollar. However, when they tried to exchange for more tokens in the spot trading system and disperse them to multiple wallets, the operation failed.

An executive of the project stated that the attackers' actions only affected the balance in their own wallets. Due to the protocol limiting rapid asset transfers, the attackers could not move a large amount of stablecoin outside the network. Although a significant amount of assets were generated, they were unable to cash them out.

The platform stated that the attack lasted about 20 minutes, but it did not affect the security of other users' funds.

Interestingly, after the asset transfer failed, the attackers actively contacted the platform's officials. They claimed that this was just a "malicious penetration test" aimed at identifying potential system vulnerabilities and notifying the core developers. Subsequently, the attackers also destroyed all problematic stablecoins.

This attacked platform is a decentralized non-custodial stablecoin network, whose stablecoins are pegged to various world currencies and assets, including gold, euros, and US dollars. The platform claims to be fully auditable and open-source, allowing for value transfer and simplifying the conversion process between different assets.

This event highlights the security challenges faced by decentralized finance platforms once again and reminds us of the need to continuously improve and strengthen the security mechanisms of these emerging financial systems.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMisfitvip
· 07-07 11:54
Another self-righteous penetration test, huh? Almost thought about running off with the money.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoivip
· 07-07 11:01
It only cost eleven dollars, almost managed to pull off a big fleece.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetirevip
· 07-04 15:17
What the hell penetration testing script kid?
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFishvip
· 07-04 15:09
Good thing, the attack didn't succeed and it was all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 07-04 15:08
Is stealing your own wallet considered theft?
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeekvip
· 07-04 15:08
Funds run fast on-chain, the heart that has been played people for suckers is even more anxious.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 07-04 15:00
Another one exposing their freeloading mentality.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 07-04 14:49
This round was a waste of effort.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)