📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
Electric vehicle companies partner with digital asset platforms, preorder tokenization sparks controversy
Electric vehicle companies explore new blockchain financing models, attracting industry follow
Recently, a well-known electric vehicle company announced a strategic partnership with a digital asset platform, attracting widespread attention in the industry. The company plans to tokenize its pre-order assets, bridging the Web2 and Web3 ecosystems to achieve value integration both on-chain and off-chain. This move is seen as a new attempt to combine traditional manufacturing with Blockchain technology.
Analysts point out that the company's move is aimed at converting potential future earnings into current financing tools. Specifically, it may bundle pre-orders into a "future revenue rights asset pool" and sell it externally through structured token products. This approach essentially uses a "car selling promise" to finance "car manufacturing funds," forming a logical closed loop.
This cooperation involves multiple parties: electric vehicle companies provide advance orders as the underlying assets; the digital asset platform is responsible for the trading channel and stablecoin integration; and professional institutions are responsible for asset packaging and token issuance design. This multi-party collaboration model shows that the project has been meticulously planned.
However, industry insiders have raised doubts about this. First, whether pre-orders can be considered as true "physical assets" is questionable and seems more like a commitment based on trust. Secondly, as a publicly listed company, such innovative financing models may face regulatory risks. Finally, the success or failure of the project still depends on whether the company can deliver the product on time.
Overall, this attempt reflects the efforts of traditional enterprises to seek innovative financing channels. It not only showcases the application potential of Blockchain technology in the real economy but also exposes the current contradictions between regulation and innovation. Regardless of the outcome, this will become an important case for observing the integration of traditional industries and emerging financial models.