According to IT House quoting Japan's "Yomiuri Shimbun", Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology has recently prepared guidelines for schools for productive artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT, and as soon as possible after listening to them announced that it will be published. expert opinions. The draft pointed out that productive AI poses several risks, such as copyright infringement and the spread of misinformation. $BU$ That's why schools are trying to "restrict productive AI use". $ALI$ It's convenient to take the lead while it's growing. On this basis, the outline is related to the use of generative AI in schools, including the use of generative AI in literary creation activities such as poetry and haiku, or in quizzes. $BEL$ suggests various "inappropriate" situations. In particular, the draft highlights that if a school presents creative work produced by productive artificial intelligence, such as post-reading and competition work, as the original results of students, this will be considered "inappropriate behavior" and will be reported and criticized by the relevant institutions. . Additionally, when schools use AI to create works, they must be very careful not to infringe the copyright of the work. On the other hand, the sketch also exemplifies appropriate use cases for productive AI, such as using it as part of reorganizing the way teachers work, for drafting during lesson preparation, or as an auxiliary partner for certain simulation courses. #GateioTurns10# #ContentStar# #BountyCreator # #GateioBountyCreator# #NewsMessenger# #Gate.ioDaily# #GateLive# #CryptoNewsCarnival#